For a discussion of civil alternatives to marriage.
עורך
9.06.20151:09
A uniform civil framework
In fact, a broad civil framework could yield a wider and more varied expression of Jewish identity in that it recognizes different forms of Jewish expression in rituals even when these are not strictly Orthodox. These would include a variety of Jewish revival movements such as Reform, Conservative and even secular rituals which would draw on traditional elements in an atmosphere of freedom and an absence of coercion. This would facilitate greater identification with Jewish tradition.
For an expanded discussion see Shay Zarchi, as well as: Avishalom Wesreich, Pinhas Shifman, in a position paper by the Metzilah Center, p.40
A unique religious track alongside an official civil alternative > Although I think there is a need to develop a uniform civil framework, perhaps, in order to avoid undermining the traditional notion of the marriage, this framework does not need to be defined as marriage.
To view
עורך
8.06.201515:05
A unique religious track alongside an official civil alternative
We must maintain a recognition of religious marriage as the only principal route to marriage in this state. In addition, we must offer a civil alternative for registering a couple, called “matrimonial partnership”, which would be available to couples who cannot or do not want to get married according to religious law.
Positions by: Shahar Lifshitz, Rabbi Yisrael Rosen, Rabbi Yuval Cherlow
עורך
8.06.201513:15
We must ensure that in matters relating to marriage and divorce human rights are protected. We can achieve this through interpreting the spirit of Jewish law (Halacha) in a way that embodies a democratic approach.
For this purpose I have developed a model called “acknowledge, distinguish and derive”. According to this model, one must acknowledge the fact that human rights are being violated, distinguish between civil law and Jewish law, and derive inspiration and guidance for resolving the conflict from Jewish tradition. This model has been put to use in two court rulings, which I mention.
The prominence of human rights is derived from both democratic and Jewish principles. Therefore, the pervasive infringements of these rights justifies changing the current system, from both a democratic and Jewish point-of-view.
For an expanded discussion see p.38 in the position paper
עורך
8.06.201512:53
For a discussion of the rift amongst the Jewish people
עורך
8.06.201512:40
The family is an essential cultural component of Jewish identity. A Jewish state is obligated to uphold age-old traditions and therefore must only recognize a marriage that is sanctioned by Jewish Law (Halacha). There is no option to recognize marriage in any other way, but we can accept the idea of a couple’s partnership as a private legal entity.
For an expanded discussion
עורך
8.06.201512:34
An extreme liberal view There is no justification for even the slightest infringement of individual rights in the service of values promoted by the State. For an expanded discussion
עורך
8.06.201512:25
The institution of marriage is not private but public and therefore reflects society’s perspectives on marriage and the family.
תגובות אחרונות
For a discussion of civil alternatives to marriage.
In fact, a broad civil framework could yield a wider and more varied expression of Jewish identity in that it recognizes different forms of Jewish expression in rituals even when these are not strictly Orthodox. These would include a variety of Jewish revival movements such as Reform, Conservative and even secular rituals which would draw on traditional elements in an atmosphere of freedom and an absence of coercion. This would facilitate greater identification with Jewish tradition.
For an expanded discussion see Shay Zarchi, as well as: Avishalom Wesreich, Pinhas Shifman, in a position paper by the Metzilah Center, p.40
A unique religious track alongside an official civil alternative > Although I think there is a need to develop a uniform civil framework, perhaps, in order to avoid undermining the traditional notion of the marriage, this framework does not need to be defined as marriage.
To view
A unique religious track alongside an official civil alternative
We must maintain a recognition of religious marriage as the only principal route to marriage in this state. In addition, we must offer a civil alternative for registering a couple, called “matrimonial partnership”, which would be available to couples who cannot or do not want to get married according to religious law.
Positions by: Shahar Lifshitz, Rabbi Yisrael Rosen, Rabbi Yuval Cherlow
For this purpose I have developed a model called “acknowledge, distinguish and derive”. According to this model, one must acknowledge the fact that human rights are being violated, distinguish between civil law and Jewish law, and derive inspiration and guidance for resolving the conflict from Jewish tradition. This model has been put to use in two court rulings, which I mention.
To view
The prominence of human rights is derived from both democratic and Jewish principles. Therefore, the pervasive infringements of these rights justifies changing the current system, from both a democratic and Jewish point-of-view.
For an expanded discussion see p.38 in the position paper
For a discussion of the rift amongst the Jewish people
The family is an essential cultural component of Jewish identity. A Jewish state is obligated to uphold age-old traditions and therefore must only recognize a marriage that is sanctioned by Jewish Law (Halacha). There is no option to recognize marriage in any other way, but we can accept the idea of a couple’s partnership as a private legal entity.
For an expanded discussion
An extreme liberal view There is no justification for even the slightest infringement of individual rights in the service of values promoted by the State. For an expanded discussion
The institution of marriage is not private but public and therefore reflects society’s perspectives on marriage and the family.
מקורות אחרונים
פרופ' אלון הראל זכויות
למדינה זכות להתערב ולקדם תפיסות ערכיות – דני סטטמן
על בית המשפט לדבר ב"קול צלול" על זכויות האדם – סוזן וייס
פרופ' מאיר בוזגלו
עורך
פרופ' אלון הראל
דני סטטמן
מנחה
דעת הרב אליעזר מלמד
סוזן וייס
איילת ברג-ורמן